Always Pop Out: Disabling Reading Pane Reply - MSOutlook.info: This is one of those options you really can search forever for if you are not really sure what you are looking for. The fact that the option itself doesn’t hold a reference to “Pop Out” as well, doesn’t exactly help either.
To stop Outlook from using the Reading Pane when replying or forwarding a message, enable the following option:
File-> Options-> Mail-> section: Replies and forwards-> option: Open replies and forwards in a new window
Wednesday, September 24, 2014
Monday, June 30, 2014
HOW TO Foster Sustainable Behavior
Hi Dave,
I did pilot projects at two large townhouses and several apartment buildings in Metro Vancouver. The thing that was universal is that THERE WAS NEVER ENOUGH VOLUME.
Metro Vancouver's goal is to divert 70% from garbage, and yet over and over again, 90% of the volume was for garbage and 10% was for recycling.
It does not matter how much signage, how many brochures, how many Recycling Captains or community groups or bylaw officers you have, if you only give them 10% of the space, you will capture at most 15% of the materials.
People want to recycle. They want to do the right thing. Very few people are sociopaths. If you give them a system that works FOR PEOPLE, they will use it. You can see we would get 15% of the material in only 10% of the space--people were really jamming it in.
(I emphasize the system must work for the people, because almost all of our systems are built to work for the recycling trucks, or the materials sales, or the bulldozers, or the incinerators. These mechanical systems should serve the residents, not the other way around. Unless you want to fail, that is.)
Shifting the space also sends strong social signals--nothing says reduce your garbage like a giant recycling bin and a small garbage can.
Because of the very space constraints you mention, we experimented with common bins, especially for cardboard. This was very easy in townhouses, but we also saw some good results by just dropping one in an alley for everybody to use.
We thought it was best to calculate tote and dumpster needs by the number of bedrooms--that gives a better sense of how many people are actually using the system.
So, say at a townhouse complex, in each little cul-de-sac, we had a garbage dumpster, a dumpster for cardboard, centralized totes for food and yard scraps, and a big blue tote shared between two units.
The absolute least I would recommend is a 96 gallon tote for every 14 bedrooms. That is AFTER you have cardboard, food scraps and garbage containers in place. If you are going to expect people to fit their cardboard in a blue tote, you should probably double the totes.
As a side note, to emphasize the fact that people CAN NOT recycled if you do not give them the space --take a look at Maple Ridge. They are far and away the most impressive system in the Lower Mainland, and probably in most of North America. They have six recycling streams, all colour coded. If your tote fills up, you can give them a call and they will come empty it.
They know you need space in your tote in order to recycle. This is the only jurisdiction I have ever seen that TRULY acts like they want you to recycle.
Ruben Anderson
smallanddeliciouslife.com
I did pilot projects at two large townhouses and several apartment buildings in Metro Vancouver. The thing that was universal is that THERE WAS NEVER ENOUGH VOLUME.
Metro Vancouver's goal is to divert 70% from garbage, and yet over and over again, 90% of the volume was for garbage and 10% was for recycling.
It does not matter how much signage, how many brochures, how many Recycling Captains or community groups or bylaw officers you have, if you only give them 10% of the space, you will capture at most 15% of the materials.
People want to recycle. They want to do the right thing. Very few people are sociopaths. If you give them a system that works FOR PEOPLE, they will use it. You can see we would get 15% of the material in only 10% of the space--people were really jamming it in.
(I emphasize the system must work for the people, because almost all of our systems are built to work for the recycling trucks, or the materials sales, or the bulldozers, or the incinerators. These mechanical systems should serve the residents, not the other way around. Unless you want to fail, that is.)
Shifting the space also sends strong social signals--nothing says reduce your garbage like a giant recycling bin and a small garbage can.
Because of the very space constraints you mention, we experimented with common bins, especially for cardboard. This was very easy in townhouses, but we also saw some good results by just dropping one in an alley for everybody to use.
We thought it was best to calculate tote and dumpster needs by the number of bedrooms--that gives a better sense of how many people are actually using the system.
So, say at a townhouse complex, in each little cul-de-sac, we had a garbage dumpster, a dumpster for cardboard, centralized totes for food and yard scraps, and a big blue tote shared between two units.
The absolute least I would recommend is a 96 gallon tote for every 14 bedrooms. That is AFTER you have cardboard, food scraps and garbage containers in place. If you are going to expect people to fit their cardboard in a blue tote, you should probably double the totes.
As a side note, to emphasize the fact that people CAN NOT recycled if you do not give them the space --take a look at Maple Ridge. They are far and away the most impressive system in the Lower Mainland, and probably in most of North America. They have six recycling streams, all colour coded. If your tote fills up, you can give them a call and they will come empty it.
They know you need space in your tote in order to recycle. This is the only jurisdiction I have ever seen that TRULY acts like they want you to recycle.
Ruben Anderson
smallanddeliciouslife.com
Monday, December 9, 2013
Data Sources Unaccessible [Archive] - ATLAS.ti Forum
Please help! Data Sources Unaccessible [Archive] - ATLAS.ti Forum: I was unable to access my primary documents. In the Primary Doc Manager, the first three primary documents are in red color while the others are in black. Those three primary documents are in red in all backup HUs, so I cannot reload them from anywhere. I am unable to access those first three PDs which are very important :( All codes are still in the code manager but all quotations disappear from the output as you can see from the message below :(
If anyone knows how to fix this, please help suggest me and I will very appreciate that. I have time limit in collecting data as a student so please let me know ASAP. I am looking forward to hearing from all of you. Thank you in advances :D
If anyone knows how to fix this, please help suggest me and I will very appreciate that. I have time limit in collecting data as a student so please let me know ASAP. I am looking forward to hearing from all of you. Thank you in advances :D
I think I solved the problem:
When you right klick on the document that doesn't open, click on Data Source Management. Then you'll have the following option, which is a quote from the Help Menu:
Reset Last Access Information
To avoid accessing the wrong document, ATLAS.ti memorizes the certain state (size, date, path) of a document each time it was successfully accessed.
If ATLAS.ti detects a deviation between this access information and the referenced file, it assumes that it has been edited with another software or that it has been replaced with another version.
Because such changes bear the danger of corrupting the alignment of quotations, loading is rejected.
However, in some situations everything might be in good order. If you know for sure that the current state of the document would not render any of the work done in the primary document, like quote creation and/or coding, useless, you may force ATLAS.ti to accept the modified document as a legal primary document’s data source: choose Documents/Data Source Management/Reset Last Access Information. This synchronizes the access information stored in the HU with the actual access info of the file. An example of an action that does not negatively affect a PD is adding text at the end of a data document.
Note: With this powerful option you can make files loadable that could detrimentally affect your work. If you detect misaligned quotations after you chose this procedure, you know you did something wrong. If this has happened, you should either leave the HU without saving or correct all misaligned quotations manually.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)